Research for every critical decision
Diligence, competitive intelligence, market analysis, and regulatory mapping, each produced with the same structured, verified, and traceable methodology.
Corporate development & M&A teams
Diligence
The problem
Traditional diligence relies on fragmented desk research, outdated databases, and analyst teams stitching together findings under time pressure. Critical risks get buried in slide decks. Context is lost between workstreams. The final memo reflects who had bandwidth, not what actually matters.
What’s inside the report
- Structured diligence memo with cited findings
- Risk flags with severity and source attribution
- Market context and competitive positioning analysis
- Key player profiles with verified data points
- Sources appendix with direct links
What makes it decision-grade
Every finding traces back to a cited source. Risk flags include severity ratings and corroborating evidence. The structure follows a repeatable methodology so your team can compare targets consistently across deals.
Strategy & product teams
Competitive Intelligence
The problem
Competitive landscapes shift faster than quarterly review cycles. Strategy teams spend weeks assembling fragmented data from earnings calls, press releases, job postings, and product changelogs, only to deliver a snapshot that is already stale by the time it reaches the executive team.
What’s inside the report
- Competitive landscape with positioning analysis
- Feature and capability comparison matrices
- Pricing and packaging breakdowns
- Market share estimates with source attribution
- Strategic move timeline for each competitor
What makes it decision-grade
Comparisons are structured for side-by-side evaluation, not narrative summaries. Each data point cites its origin. Estimates are labeled as such, with the underlying evidence visible so your team can assess confidence independently.
Example table of contents
- 1. Landscape Overview & Market Structure
- 2. Competitor Profiles (per player)
- 3. Feature & Capability Comparison
- 4. Pricing & Packaging Analysis
- 5. Go-to-Market Strategy Assessment
- 6. Market Share & Growth Estimates
- 7. Strategic Signals & Recent Moves
- 8. Sources & Methodology Notes
Investment & corporate strategy teams
Market Analysis
The problem
Market sizing exercises often devolve into cherry-picked numbers from syndicated reports. Growth narratives lack rigor. Teams waste cycles reconciling conflicting estimates from different sources without a clear framework for which numbers to trust and why.
What’s inside the report
- Market sizing with bottom-up and top-down estimates
- Growth driver analysis with supporting evidence
- Key player mapping and market share breakdown
- Demand-side and supply-side dynamics
- Segment-level detail where data permits
What makes it decision-grade
Sizing methodologies are transparent: you see the inputs, assumptions, and sources behind every estimate. Where multiple sources conflict, the report flags the discrepancy and presents each figure with attribution rather than averaging away the uncertainty.
Example table of contents
- 1. Market Definition & Scope
- 2. Market Size Estimates (TAM / SAM / SOM)
- 3. Growth Drivers & Inhibitors
- 4. Market Structure & Segmentation
- 5. Key Player Profiles & Share Estimates
- 6. Demand & Supply Dynamics
- 7. Outlook & Scenario Framing
- 8. Sources & Methodology Notes
Compliance & legal teams
Regulatory & Risk
The problem
Regulatory landscapes span jurisdictions, agencies, and evolving rulemaking timelines. Teams default to expensive outside counsel for questions that could be scoped with structured desk research. Change tracking is manual. Gaps only surface when it is too late.
What’s inside the report
- Regulatory scan across relevant jurisdictions
- Jurisdiction-level requirement summaries
- Risk flags with regulatory source citations
- Change tracking against prior scans
- Timeline of upcoming regulatory milestones
What makes it decision-grade
Every requirement maps to its regulatory source with direct citations. Jurisdiction comparisons are structured for consistent review. Change tracking highlights what shifted between versions so your team focuses on what is new, not what was already known.
Example table of contents
- 1. Regulatory Landscape Overview
- 2. Jurisdiction-Level Requirements
- 3. Key Regulatory Bodies & Mandates
- 4. Compliance Risk Flags & Assessment
- 5. Pending & Proposed Rule Changes
- 6. Regulatory Timeline & Milestones
- 7. Cross-Jurisdiction Comparison
- 8. Sources & Methodology Notes